…Is the question asked on the BBC Magazine website. So, do we? I have to admit that I like to learn something new when reading a novel, even if it’s only a description, a scene being set of a place I’ve never been. There’s nothing like it, being inside someone else’s head. And that’s something that all the movie-watching, gaming and newspaper-reading* in the universe could never give us in a million years. Reading is a form of telepathy and I believe it helps develop true empathy.
So no, you don’t need books to be clever at all. But books can help make us more human.*Nothing at all against any of these activities, btw. I do quite a bit of the former, a little of the latter, and a very teensy tiny bit of gaming too (teensy and tiny because, a: I am crap at it, and, b: I haven't enough time to learn how to be good at it. Sigh).
- Location:At Home
- Mood:
thoughtful - Music:The Magic Flute


Comments
So do you need books to be clever? Almost certainly not, but in my opinion they are irreplaceable. Raw information is virtually free these days, but fiction remains an art that can teach appreciation of the world around us.
Ok. I'm rambling. :)
I do love movies, though. I don't watch as many of those as I used to - no time - but, given my druthers, I'd rather watch a good movie than almost any other activity you can think of (is watching a movie an activity? - more like an inactivity!) except reading.
Frogger anyone?